Somasu wrote:
there has to be a rule against reviveing threads that are more then 2 weeks old.
well wtf its still on the front page how am i supposed to know
| NukeSilo Community https://forums.nukesilo.net/ |
|
| WoW mid-game crisis https://forums.nukesilo.net/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=2791 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Pantera_666 [ 24 Oct 2005, 16:11 ] |
| Post subject: | WoW mid-game crisis |
k just 3 days i finally got my human warlock to lvl 40, got my warlock mount, yet now i dont really have much motive to continue to lvl 60... why is this? can anyone tell me? |
|
| Author: | timmah [ 24 Oct 2005, 17:59 ] |
| Post subject: | |
It gets like that. I got my Human Pally to 44.. And I could already own lvl 60s so i left. And seriously, I owned a 60 Shaman before.. IT was hilarious. |
|
| Author: | Pantera_666 [ 25 Oct 2005, 00:49 ] |
| Post subject: | |
but i mean just seeing myself in my felheart (epic 60) set... *drooling prefusely and extensively* on my epic mount. Idk im so confused right now aaaaahhh! |
|
| Author: | timmah [ 25 Oct 2005, 18:04 ] |
| Post subject: | |
lol Well my friend traded his 56 Gnome Warlock account with his buddy, who gave him his Jedi Account on SWG.... yeah... |
|
| Author: | Pantera_666 [ 25 Oct 2005, 18:33 ] |
| Post subject: | |
weird trade :\... |
|
| Author: | S34L [ 25 Oct 2005, 21:20 ] |
| Post subject: | |
I have a level 30 Hunter Night Elf and It was able to Whope Level 30s wen it was level 28 which is actually good becuase I beat a pally level 30 with my Hunter and Rouges just suck. |
|
| Author: | brandon7219 [ 14 Nov 2005, 17:39 ] |
| Post subject: | |
timmah wrote: It gets like that. I got my Human Pally to 44.. And I could already own lvl 60s so i left. And seriously, I owned a 60 Shaman before.. IT was hilarious. then that shaman really really REALLY SUCKED!!!!! He prolly bought the account off ebay or sumthin... |
|
| Author: | Katamari [ 13 Dec 2005, 18:14 ] |
| Post subject: | |
BUMP on accident but is he 60 yet? |
|
| Author: | Somasu [ 13 Dec 2005, 18:16 ] |
| Post subject: | |
there has to be a rule against reviveing threads that are more then 2 weeks old. |
|
| Author: | Katamari [ 13 Dec 2005, 18:18 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Somasu wrote: there has to be a rule against reviveing threads that are more then 2 weeks old. well wtf its still on the front page how am i supposed to know
|
|
| Author: | Somasu [ 13 Dec 2005, 18:22 ] |
| Post subject: | |
at the very top of the post it says Quote: Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:18 pm Post subject:
|
|
| Author: | Katamari [ 13 Dec 2005, 18:25 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Somasu wrote: at the very top of the post it says Quote: Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 4:18 pm Post subject: lol YEA no duh dude but i dont read that every time i post >: ( |
|
| Author: | Somasu [ 13 Dec 2005, 18:26 ] |
| Post subject: | |
Iv said it befor and i'll say it again.Think befor you post. |
|
| Author: | Supernuker [ 13 Dec 2005, 19:30 ] |
| Post subject: | |
geez somasu. I don't really care they revived a old topic if its on the front page.. as long as it isn't in the news section, or like on the 2nd page. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-06:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|