| NukeSilo Community https://forums.nukesilo.net/ |
|
| Civil Suit 101 https://forums.nukesilo.net/viewtopic.php?f=109&t=6490 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Rampage [ 23 Feb 2008, 08:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Civil Suit 101 |
Civil Suit #101 ******************* ******************* Filed 22nd February, 2008 by Deborah M. Sykes, Court Reporter. Plantiff: Hobbes D. Erminius Represented by Allehandro Willisimo, Esq. Respondant: Chief of Police Mark Lippold 1 Alleged, that Respondant did on the night of Febrary 22nd enter the 7-11 at which Plantiff is a security clerk; 2 that Respondant did in full knowledge of the illegality of his actions sieze cans of soda having a worth of twenty-five dollars; 3 that Respondant did exit the store with said sodas, ignoring the complaints of the Plantiff who attempted to prevent this action as per her duty; 4 that Repondant did at a later time refute attempts on the part of the Plantiff to redress this greivance, saying, "I didn't see a name on it." 5 that as a result of the Respondants actions, Plantiff was robbed of two hundred dollars, which is the amount Plantiff now claims. Signed, Deborah M. Sykes, Court Reporter. Allehandro Willisimo, Esq on behalf of Hobbes D Erminius (( 200$ claimed by Hobbes D Erminius against Chief of Police Mark Lippold. Please, keep the OOC out of this. For criminal cases, everything is handled at the moment in the server, but civil cases are less pressing so I find posting them like this is better. Now the defense can refute whatever he wants; either the entire thing or individual paragraphs.)) |
|
| Author: | duckeh [ 23 Feb 2008, 14:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
Al Willis wrote: 5 that as a result of the Respondants actions, Plantiff was robbed of two hundred dollars, which is the amount Plantiff now claims. The total retail value of said cans of soda is $25.00, yet I am being sued for the amount of $200.00. |
|
| Author: | Rampage [ 23 Feb 2008, 15:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
Plantiff claims she suffered 175 dollars worth of damadge, due to loss of consumer confidence and stress, ect. |
|
| Author: | Harvantes [ 23 Feb 2008, 16:01 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
I hereby accept this document as truth. |
|
| Author: | duckeh [ 23 Feb 2008, 19:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
Plaintiff is employed as a guard at the 7-11, not a clerk, thus having no costumers that could lose confidence. |
|
| Author: | duckeh [ 27 Feb 2008, 11:34 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
I am giving the suing party two days to respond before I consider this suit null. Starting Wedensday, February 27th. Ending Friday, February 29th. |
|
| Author: | Rampage [ 27 Feb 2008, 15:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
duckeh wrote: Plaintiff is employed as a guard at the 7-11, not a clerk, thus having no costumers that could lose confidence. Her duties as gaurd include customer relations, and the welfare of the store is certainly part of her concern. The customers lost confidence in the 7-11 in general, which harms the livelihood of my client. |
|
| Author: | Maxwell Murder [ 27 Feb 2008, 15:36 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
duckeh wrote: I am giving the suing party two days to respond before I consider this suit null. Starting Wedensday, February 27th. Ending Friday, February 29th. (( Not your call. )) |
|
| Author: | duckeh [ 28 Feb 2008, 11:26 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
I am willing to pay the sum of $25 for the cost of the property in quetion. No more. (( Oh, as I see it, it would be. Seeing as I would just ingnore it afterwards. As it is its a frivialous lawsuit and a waste of everyones time. There's no jury/jugde to decide the case, proper filling procedures were passed and was filed before informing me of such action, thus giving me no time to prepare my argument.)) |
|
| Author: | Maxwell Murder [ 28 Feb 2008, 13:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
(( Regardless of all that and what kingofthemat just said, I still don't see a defendant simply throwing out a case because it's unfair or a waste of time, even as the Chief. Perhaps I am wrong. )) |
|
| Author: | duckeh [ 28 Feb 2008, 15:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
(( I'm not throwing the case out, I was stating I would consider the case dead it if the prosecution fails to make a counter argument in a reasonable amount of time. Which did not happen, so that is no longer an issue.)) |
|
| Author: | Harvantes [ 01 Mar 2008, 23:47 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
(( Yeah, where IS Al, anyway? Does anyone know? )) |
|
| Author: | Rampage [ 02 Mar 2008, 08:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
(( Im around, just that im grounded off of TS this weekend ending today. Ill be back on soon.)) |
|
| Author: | Al Willis [ 22 Mar 2008, 21:39 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Civil Suit 101 |
Bump |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC-06:00 |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|